1983-84 Star #25 James Worthy SP XRC BAS BGS Auto "True Rookie Card" ("TRC")

Description: 1983-84 Star #25 James Worthy XRC BGS BAS Authentic Card and Autograph. BGS Serial #0010000079. Card is not graded but has been authenticated. Authentic grade on card confirms it is considered original and unaltered by Beckett. BAS authenticated the autograph. Item will be sent out to U.S. buyer via USPS priority mail signature confirmation within one business day after cleared payment is received. If you want to learn more about Star Co. basketball cards, you can do so at basketballgold.com We value the feedback we receive. Please let us know if there is any problem prior to leaving any neutral or negative feedback. We will try our best to resolve the issue. Thank you. Disclaimer: I am only listing this as Worthy's XRC because that is what the sports card industry technically considers it. It is not the seller's position that this card is an XRC nor do I believe that anyone with common sense respectively should take that position. Star Co. had an exclusive contract with the NBA for three years and the cards were distributed nationally. Certain cards were part of regular sets (three regular sets were issued from 1983-1986) and certain cards were part of subsets (i.e. Gatorade, Crunch, Lite, etc). The only explanation I have received thus far has been the Star Co. cards are designated as XRC’s for various players because the cards were not distributed in packs, but in set form, and analogized the Star cards to Topps Traded and Fleer Update sets. The statement that the Star Co. basketball cards were only distributed in set form, while incorrect, is meaningless. Other explanations have stated that the cards were not sold in packs in retail stores. Whether the cards were issued in packs, team bags or shot out of a cannonball is irrelevant because only Star Co. had a license with the NBA at the time.The question is not if the Star cards are rookies, it is how they could not be considered rookies. An NBA rookie card is a player’s first appearance on a regular issue card from one of the major card producing companies that has a license with the NBA. If it is the position that these cards fit the definition of XRC and not rookie, then perhaps the definitions of XRC and/or rookie are wrong, or the industry’s interpretation is wrong. Star cards were not produced in set form. The regular issued sets were issued in team bags. It is not for us to say how the Star Co. should or should not have issued its cards, but certainly issuing cards in team bags is closer to the definition of issuing cards in packs than sets. How a team bag is analogous to a Topps Traded set which existed primarily for baseball players called up at the end of the season is known only to those who refuse to recognize a true rookie card. Topps also had a separate regular issued set when it issued Traded sets. It does not take a genius to know that Barry Bonds' 1986 Topps Traded card is his XRC and his 1987 Topps card is his rookie card. The card listed is Star Co. 1983-84 #25 James Worthy that was part of Star’s regular issued first year set. This should be considered Worthy's rookie card, but it is inexplicably labeled as an XRC. James Worthy had a second year Star Co. card, 1984-85 #184, that was part of Star Co.’s regular issued second year set. The logic of how the card was released means that if Star had changed how it distributed its cards and his 1984-85 #184 card was released in “packs” and/or in a retail store, the Worthy second year Star Card (1984-85 #184) would actually be his rookie card and the Star Co. would have released his XRC (1983-84 #25) and his rookie card – his XRC being released for his rookie season and his rookie card being released for his sophomore year. Does that defy common sense? Would that have been the industry's determination?

Price: 1499.99 USD

Location: FastShipping, USA

End Time: 2025-01-17T05:51:10.000Z

Shipping Cost: 11.99 USD